Thread:Nkstjoa/@comment-1459886-20140604164842

Yeah... back in January of this year (I think) you posted a comment on my Unoffical Guide Lines asking about "what is your stance on third-party vs. third-party rivalries? Should every rivalry have at least one PlayStation character? "

1st Answer: I think thrid party rivalries are fine as long as there is a logical rivalry between the two characters in question, your not gonna put Alma Wade have a rivalry with Crash Bandicoot because it doesnt make since, what is there even in common between those two? (Retorical question by the way)

2nd Answer: I dont think we should impose that kind of rule on Rivalries because a rivalry implies that there is some kind of emotional connection between right? We shouldnt force that connection between characters that may not even have a reason to fight, didnt you notice while playing the actual game that there were a couple of rivalries that were a bit forced and awkward like Sackboy and Big Daddy this kind of rivalry in well written scenario wouldnt result in a fight because people have the common sense of talking before they put them selves in arms way, therefore its is in my opinion not necessary to put any kind of rule making every 3rd party character have a 1st party Rival, and really by the end it would just feel over used, repetitive and dull.

I hope this answered youre questions and again I am very sorry about this believe it or not I have had a chaotic couple of months ,so chaotic to the point of making me go less to the internet at least to the Wikis anyway.

So have a nice dawn and/or dusk.

Regards, dbzpro2matrix 